The real reason why public hearing had no comments

On Sept. 20, 2008, the Kent Reporter published an article concerning the lack of public input at Kent City hearings. Council member Jamie Danielson was struck that no residents showed up at a public hearing to talk about the budget.

On Sept. 20, 2008, the Kent Reporter published an article concerning the lack of public input at Kent City hearings. Council member Jamie Danielson was struck that no residents showed up at a public hearing to talk about the budget.

Council member Danielson, have you ever heard of terms “falls on deaf ears,” “you can’t fight city hall,” and “mother knows best?” These terms are exactly why no one shows up at the public hearings.

Over the last several years, a Save our Neighbor Group has been fighting City hall to stop a 2-mile street project named by locals as the “Road to Nowhere.” The street project will extend 224th Street over Highway 167 from East Valley to Benson.

City Hall received almost 100 letters and a petition signed by 650 residents opposing the project. Citizens expressed concern because the project did not relieve traffic congestion, a residential neighborhood would be destroyed, and precious wetlands would be lost. Our group was mystified because widening 212th was a far less costly ($25 million less) and more efficient option than the 224th Street project.

We later found out that scrapping the project was not an option.

For over a decade the City had collected monies from developers. These monies (over $10 million) were earmarked for 224th and could not be shifted to other projects that made sense. In other words, “use it or lose it”.

The public was allowed to speak at a Public Works Committee meeting on Feb. 25, 2008. At this meeting, the audience was lectured (like a bunch of third graders) by a non-committee Council member as to why this road should be approved. Planning staff did not adequately address many questions. They looked like deer in the headlights and made a very poor attempt of smoke and mirrors.

To avoid further embarrassment, the city prohibited people from speaking at a continuation meeting on March 17. More importantly, residents were not allowed to speak at the April 1 full Council meeting, where the final vote was taken. You’d think the entire Council would have liked to hear from the public before authorizing a $36 million expenditure. So much for democracy!

And you wonder why no one shows up at public hearings – mother does know best.

Jack Nixon

Kent


Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing editor@kentreporter.com.

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website http://kowloonland.com.hk/?big=submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) Please keep letters to 300 words or less.

More in Letters to the Editor

Email editor@kentreporter.com
For every vote to count, Kent needs district-based elections | Guest column

By Mónica Mendoza-Castrejón Guest Column If you’re a community member here in… Continue reading

Email editor@kentreporter.com
Letters: Support King County Charter Amendment

Support King County Charter Amendment As a lifelong resident of King County,… Continue reading

Messes in Mill Creek Canyon

Thank you for your very informative article (“Cleaning up Mill Creek Canyon… Continue reading

Priced out of our homes

Priced out of our homes In the middle of everything that is… Continue reading

Kent School Board addresses death of George Floyd

The recent death of Mr. George Floyd at the hands of a… Continue reading

Some good advice in the fight against infection

School closings, sports event cancellations, food hoarding. … We live in a… Continue reading

City should focus on the real problem, a health crisis

It is time for the city officials of Kent to stop their… Continue reading

How much effect will virus have?

The situation regarding King County’s acquisition of the Econo Lodge in Kent… Continue reading

Coronavirus: County made hasty choice in Kent as a quarantine city
Coronavirus: County made hasty choice in Kent as a quarantine city

Like many Kent residents, I was blindsided when I heard, late Wednesday… Continue reading