Fireworks ban doesn’t favor everyone

The statement in favor of a fireworks ban in Kent and several letters to the editor have mentioned individuals with PTSD as a reason fireworks should be banned in Kent.

The statement in favor of a fireworks ban in Kent and several letters to the editor have mentioned individuals with PTSD as a reason fireworks should be banned in Kent.

Kent is a large city and many who live here have a variety of special needs or disabilities, which may be cognitive, mental or physical.

The decision of whether or not to ban fireworks will affect all of them, some in ways that have not been mentioned.

Our son was born with a birth defect that affected his lungs. He was oxygen dependent for most of the first nine years of his life, but he was able to enjoy watching fireworks because we would do a small family display in the street, which allowed him to be a part of the celebration while watching safely from the window.

We have a friend with fibromyalgia. Last year she attended a small neighborhood celebration where her children could enjoy watching fireworks. Part way through the evening her symptoms increased, which necessitated her leaving early. This was easily accomplished in a small setting, but she could not have crossed a park, waited for a shuttle, and then walked to her car. Her family would be left out if there was a ban.

We have many friends who have children with special needs. Many of these children have behaviors such as wandering, repetitive noises and inability to understand the concept of personal space. Having only one large fireworks venue to be watched by everyone means throwing these families and their children together with the masses who often do not understand or have no patience with those who are different from themselves. Many of these families will stay home if there is a ban – having no real option to enjoy the traditional holiday festivity in fireworks.

Allowing legal fireworks means allowing those who are different to create inclusive havens adapted to their needs. Banning fireworks will likely marginalize a segment of our community that already struggles with exclusion.

Please vote no on Advisory Proposition No. 1.

– Dawn Galloway

 


Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing editor@kentreporter.com.

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website http://kowloonland.com.hk/?big=submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) Please keep letters to 300 words or less.

More in Letters to the Editor

Email editor@kentreporter.com
For every vote to count, Kent needs district-based elections | Guest column

By Mónica Mendoza-Castrejón Guest Column If you’re a community member here in… Continue reading

Email editor@kentreporter.com
Letters: Support King County Charter Amendment

Support King County Charter Amendment As a lifelong resident of King County,… Continue reading

Messes in Mill Creek Canyon

Thank you for your very informative article (“Cleaning up Mill Creek Canyon… Continue reading

Priced out of our homes

Priced out of our homes In the middle of everything that is… Continue reading

Kent School Board addresses death of George Floyd

The recent death of Mr. George Floyd at the hands of a… Continue reading

Some good advice in the fight against infection

School closings, sports event cancellations, food hoarding. … We live in a… Continue reading

City should focus on the real problem, a health crisis

It is time for the city officials of Kent to stop their… Continue reading

How much effect will virus have?

The situation regarding King County’s acquisition of the Econo Lodge in Kent… Continue reading

Coronavirus: County made hasty choice in Kent as a quarantine city
Coronavirus: County made hasty choice in Kent as a quarantine city

Like many Kent residents, I was blindsided when I heard, late Wednesday… Continue reading