{"id":18368,"date":"2013-04-01T10:21:37","date_gmt":"2013-04-01T17:21:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spiken.wpengine.com\/news\/65-bus-routes-face-elimination-when-metro-transits-temporary-funding-expires\/"},"modified":"2016-10-21T17:55:42","modified_gmt":"2016-10-22T00:55:42","slug":"65-bus-routes-face-elimination-when-metro-transits-temporary-funding-expires","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kentreporter.com\/news\/65-bus-routes-face-elimination-when-metro-transits-temporary-funding-expires\/","title":{"rendered":"65 bus routes face elimination when Metro Transit’s temporary funding expires"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sixty-five Metro Transit<\/a> bus routes are at risk of being canceled, and service reduced on another 86 routes, if state lawmakers allow temporary two-year funding for the agency to expire without authorizing a permanent and sustainable source of revenue, according to King County officials.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

That message \u2013 showing cuts<\/a> to up to 17 percent of Metro’s service, which will cascade through the agency’s 217-route system \u2013 is included in Metro’s 2012 Service Guidelines Report<\/a>, sent today to the King County Council. The report measures and analyzes transit service based on measures of productivity, geographic value, social equity, and ridership. Included is a look at where investments are needed to reduce overcrowding, keep buses on time and meet growing demand.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The report also offers the first glimpse at which Metro routes are at risk for canceling or reducing if the state Legislature doesn’t authorize funding to fill Metro’s projected $75 million annual budget gap.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The county temporarily averted these kinds of cuts by enacting a temporary two-year Congestion Reduction Charge, but that $20-per-vehicle charge expires next year. Metro also made extensive financial reforms and raised fares to keep buses on the road. Metro’s financial reserves, which also helped provide a one-time financial stop gap, will be depleted and not available on an ongoing basis to sustain service.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

“Our analysis shows that we should be adding service to meet growing demand, but the sad reality is that \u2013 without ongoing and sufficient funding \u2013 potentially one-third of our routes are on the chopping block, and another 40 percent of our routes face reductions and revisions,” said Metro Transit General Manager Kevin Desmond. “The result would be even more crowded buses, riders left at the curb, or people climbing back into their cars \u2013 something that would worsen the region’s traffic congestion and hurt the economic engine of the state.”<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Metro\u2019s report details the performance of the transit system\u2019s 217 routes and shows at-risk routes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Routes at risk for deletion (65 routes):<\/strong> 7EX, 19, 21EX, 22, 25, 27, 30, 37, 48NEX, 57, 61, 76, 77EX, 82, 83, 84, 99, 110, 113, 114, 118EX, 119, 119EX, 123EX, 139, 152, 154, 157, 159, 161, 173, 179, 190, 192, 197, 200, 201, 203, 205EX, 210, 211EX, 213, 215, 216, 237, 243, 244EX, 250, 257, 260, 265, 268, 277, 280, 304, 308, 601EX, 907DART, 910DART, 913DART, 914DART, 919DART, 927DART, 930DART and 935DART.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Routes at risk for reductions and revisions (86 routes):<\/strong> 1, 2S, 2N, 3S, 3N, 4S, 4N, 5, 5EX, 7, 8, 9EX, 10, 11, 12, 14S, 16, 21, 24, 26, 26EX, 28, 28EX, 29, 31, 36, 41, 43, 47, 48N, 60, 65, 66EX, 67, 68, 70, 71, 72, 73, 106, 107, 116EX, 118, 121, 122, 125, 148, 156, 177, 181, 182, 186, 187, 193EX, 202, 204, 209, 214, 221, 224, 226, 232, 234,\u00a0 235, 236, 238, 241, 245, 246, 248, 249, 255, 269, 271, 309EX, 311, 312EX, 331, 355EX, 372EX, 373EX, 901DART, 903DART, 908DART, 909DART and 931DART.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Routes potentially unchanged (66 routes):<\/strong> 13, 15EX, 17EX, 18EX, 32, 33**, 40, 44, 48S, 49, 50, 55**, 56**, 62, 64EX, 74EX, 75, 101, 102, 105, 111, 120, 124, 128, 131**, 132**, 140, 143EX, 150, 153, 155, 158, 164, 166, 167, 168, 169, 178, 180, 183, 212, 217, 218, 240, 242, 252, 301, 303EX, 306EX, 316, 330, 342, 345, 346, 347, 348, 358EX, A Line, B Line, C Line, D Line, 773, 775, 915DART, 916DART, 917DART (** Routes not reduced because we expect productivity to be above the bottom 25 percent threshold due to changes since spring 2012)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

This list of routes shows the potential for cuts and revisions, however considerable additional analysis would follow during the coming year. As work continues, the public will receive additional information and opportunities to give input, both online and in face-to-face forums starting this fall.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Metro Transit reforms and revenues<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Metro\u2019s largest source of funding is sales tax revenue, and since 2008 the weak economy has caused ongoing revenue shortfalls for Metro.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The Congestion Reduction Charge provides an estimated $50 million over two years, through mid-2014. When the temporary funding expires, Metro\u2019s annual $75 million budget shortfall includes $60 million for operations and $15 million for replacement bus purchases. Metro is the ninth largest transit system in the country with a fleet of 1,400 buses that carried 115 million passengers last year \u2013 Metro\u2019s second highest ridership ever.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

In addition to the temporary Congestion Reduction Charge, Metro and the county made sweeping reforms, reductions and additional revenue from 2009-2013 to stave off major transit cuts. These changes totaled $726 million. Actions included:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n